In Canada, marriage contracts are recognized as marriage contracts under Section 52 of the Family Law Act of 1990. These marriage contracts cover the rights and obligations of the spouses as well as in the event of separation, nullity or death. You may or may not be in charge of child care. Under the Divorce Act of 1985, agreements are taken into account when deciding whether to assist the child or spouse during divorce proceedings. As a general rule, however, Community property law applies in all Canadian provinces with respect to the equitable distribution of assets. The 2010 Supreme Court`s Radmacher/Granatino trial case overturned the current legal framework to recognize the changing social and judicial views on the personal autonomy of spouses.   Pre-marriage agreements can now be applied by the courts within their discretion in financial settlement cases under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, as long as the three-tiered cycling test is completed and is considered fair in the interests of each child in the family. The cyclo-cyclo-maker requests that the courts effectively arrange a marriage agreement freely concluded by each party with a full assessment of its effects, unless, in the present circumstances, it is not fair for the parties to maintain their agreement. The case provided important guidelines, relevant to all marriage agreements that have occurred since 2010.  The Indian court struck down marital agreements for reasons contrary to public policy when, even in states that have not adopted upAA/UPMAA, such as New York, marriage contracts are recognized as the same presumption of legality as any other contract.
 It is not necessary for a couple who signs a marriage pact to keep separate lawyers to represent him as long as each party understands the agreement and signs it voluntarily with the intention of being bound by its terms. There is a strong public policy that favours parties that control and decide their own interests through contracts.  There are no state or federal laws requiring adults with contractual capacity to hire a lawyer in order to enter into a marriage contract such as a marriage contract, with the exception of a California law that requires the parties to be represented by a lawyer if spousal assistance (support) is limited by the agreement.  The marriage agreement may be challenged if it is proven that the contract was signed under duress.  Whether a pre-marriage contract was signed under duress must be justified by the facts and circumstances of this case.